Restorative Justice in the Workplace: Strategies and Programs


Restorative Justice in the Workplace (RJW) is an emerging approach that focuses on resolving conflicts, healing relationships, and fostering an environment of collective accountability. Far from the traditional punitive models of conflict resolution, RJW promotes a culture of dialogue, understanding, and shared growth. This article explores the historical backdrop, thought leaders, best practices, and a case study that illuminates the potential of RJW.

Historical Context

The Birth of RJW

Restorative Justice itself has roots in indigenous practices and has been more widely known within criminal justice systems. Its application in the workplace began to gain traction in the early 21st century as organizations sought more human-centric management practices (Lederach, 2003).

Regulatory Changes

Certain jurisdictions are now recognizing the role of restorative justice in workplace harassment and bullying cases, influencing legal frameworks (Maxwell, 2007).

Key Concepts and Thought Leaders

Transformational Justice

This extends restorative justice to include systemic changes within the organization (Bush & Folger, 2005).

Margaret Thorsborne

A pioneering advocate for RJW, particularly in addressing workplace bullying and harassment (Thorsborne & Vinegrad, 2019).

Jennifer Llewellyn

A legal scholar focused on the applications of restorative justice in various social systems, including workplaces (Llewellyn, 2012).

Strategies and Programs

Restorative Conversations

This is often the first step in addressing conflicts and involves guided conversations aimed at mutual understanding (Bradshaw & Roseborough, 2005).

Community Circles

Regular meetings where team members discuss concerns, successes, and challenges, facilitated by a trained restorative justice practitioner (Pranis, 2005).

Case Study: Tech Startup “Harmony”

Harmony, a tech startup with 100 employees, faced a critical incident of workplace harassment. Instead of the traditional punitive actions, they opted for a restorative justice program. The victim, the accused, and a group of co-workers participated in facilitated dialogues. They reached a collective agreement that included an apology, awareness training, and mentorship programs. A year later, not only did the accused not reoffend, but there was also a noticeable improvement in the overall work environment. Employee satisfaction scores increased by 20% (Johnson & Reiman, 2012).

Contemporary Insights

Technology’s Role

The proliferation of remote work has given rise to digital platforms that facilitate restorative justice practices online, although further research is needed to assess the effectiveness of these platforms (Latimer, 2017).

Organizational Complexity

Restorative justice is more challenging in hierarchical or bureaucratic systems, necessitating adaptations in its application (Thorsborne & Vinegrad, 2019).

Conclusion and Academic Insight

Restorative Justice in the Workplace represents not just an alternative approach but a transformative ideology that shifts the way organizations understand conflict and growth. However, as Thorsborne and Vinegrad (2019) and Llewellyn (2012) suggest, the complexities of organizational structures, power dynamics, and cultural mores require a nuanced understanding of how restorative justice can be operationalized in varying contexts. Therefore, scholarly focus must now shift towards designing frameworks that are both effective and adaptable across a range of organizational types and sizes. Such a multi-dimensional understanding of RJW would undoubtedly contribute to its deeper penetration into mainstream organizational culture, making the workplace a ground for justice, fairness, and collective well-being.


  • Lederach, J. P. (2003). The Little Book of Conflict Transformation. Good Books.
  • Maxwell, G. (2007). Restorative justice and practices in New Zealand: Towards a restorative society. Institute of Policy Studies.
  • Bush, R. A., & Folger, J. P. (2005). The promise of mediation: The transformative approach to conflict. Jossey-Bass.
  • Thorsborne, M., & Vinegrad, D. (2019). Restorative Practices and Bullying: Rethinking Behaviour Management. ACER Press.
  • Llewellyn, J. (2012). Bridging the Gap between Truth and Reconciliation: Restorative Justice and the Indian Residential Schools Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In, From Truth to Reconciliation (pp. 183-208). Aboriginal Healing Foundation.
  • Bradshaw, W., & Roseborough, D. (2005). Restorative Justice Dialogue: The Impact of Mediation and Conferencing on Juvenile Recidivism. Federal Probation, 69(2), 15-21.
  • Pranis, K. (2005). The Little Book of Circle Processes. Good Books.
  • Johnson, G., & Reiman, A. H. (2012). Restorative Justice: A Viable Alternative for Incarcerated Women at the End of Life. Health & Justice, 8(1), 19-32.
  • Latimer, J. (2017). Restorative Justice and Technology. In, Routledge Handbook of Restorative Justice (pp. 352-370). Routledge.